Skip to main content

Dealing with decarbonisation

Global greenhouse gas emissions continued to grow for the third consecutive year in 2019, reaching a record high of 52.4 GtCO2e[1]

 

Climate change is a financial risk for all corporate debt issuers because it will impact how global economies perform as a whole as companies work to address both physical and transition risks. The risks associated with climate risk are systemic in nature, which means they will affect all assets to some extent. Around 127 countries, representing 63% of global greenhouse gas emissions have net zero-goals, which includes the US[2].

Carbon is a key measure for assessing the impact of climate change risk. This is because carbon emissions are a measure of greenhouse gases, which need to reduce sharply in order to meet the temperature rise limits set out under the 2°C Paris Agreement, falling from 52.4 to 40 GtCO2e by 2030[3] – a 23% fall. This requires a significant reduction in carbon emissions.

Furthermore, regulation will drive change as governments continue to announce their intention of reaching carbon-neutrality by 2050 and this will accelerate the drive for decarbonisation – the reduction of carbon, or putting it another way, balancing the emissions of carbon with their removal that companies produce in their day-to-day activities.

Decarbonisation is key because as the chart outlines below, in the US, for example, carbon emissions are responsible for around 80% of overall greenhouse gas emissions. Paris Agreement targets are looking at a sub-2°C by 2050 to achieve net-zero - which is when emissions of greenhouse gases are balanced by their removal, primarily through renewable energy. 

Source Total U.S. Emissions in 2019 = 6,558 Million Metric Tons of CO2equivalent (excludes land sector). Percentages may not add up to 100% due to independent rounding. www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases

Not all carbon is equal
There are a number of pathways to assessing climate risk through carbon. The main sources of carbon varies by industry sector – some companies and sectors are more carbon-intensive than others, such as the Oil & Gas, Transportation and Industrials. A company’s scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 emissions is another source of carbon, which we’ve outlined below:

Scope 1
This looks at carbon emissions of an issuer or company under its direct control. Examples include fleet vehicles, boilers, combustion and chemical productions

Scope 2
Involves indirect carbon emissions. This looks at emissions from purchase or acquired electricity heat and cooling.

Scope 3
Scope 3 carbon emissions looks at everything beyond a company’s direct scope of operations. This includes emissions across an issuer’s supply chain and end-product usage by its customers. As such, scope 3 looks at a range of indirect emissions, such as business travel, employee commuting, purchased goods and services and capital goods. Issuers have less visibility and control over these emissions – but they remain important. For example, according to MSCI, scope 3 emissions of the integrated oil and gas industry (measured by the constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index) are more than six times the level of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions[4].

Currently, the predominant measure of greenhouse gases are Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions data, as there is a level of uncertainty surrounding Scope 3 emissions and they are typically not included in corporate disclosure. These metrics help determine how exposed issuers may be to climate change and transition impacts that may emerge towards net-zero.

Furthermore, all sectors generate a carbon footprint, primarily through the energy they use, but some sectors are more carbon intensive than others. Over 70% of global greenhouse gas emissions (or carbon) can be traced to energy generation across all industry sectors, which is outlined in the chart below. The energy transition is a core focus in reducing these emissions as issuers turn to energy conservation, renewables and switches to low-carbon electricity.

Around 40% of global greenhouse emissions are driven or influenced by companies through their purchases (purchased goods and services) and through the products they sell (use of sold products)[5]

Considering impacts of climate change
We are heavily focused on the strategy that issuers have in transitioning to lower carbon, looking at actions to decrease emissions in the short-term and in the long-term – and reviewing their momentum of change. Understanding the full picture of their emissions, especially across their value chain, will be key. With this in mind, it’s important to continue encouraging companies across sectors to disclose and be more transparent on their carbon emissions across the value chain by disclosing in line with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. This will help harmonise disclosed data and identify hotspots, which we can explore further through our engagement programme with issuers.

We focus on bottom-up climate-related risk analysis to understand how well issuers are factoring in climate and transition risks so we can better understand the investment impacts.  However, one year’s worth of data only provides a snapshot - we need to measure this information in a consistent way year after year to identify if there is a positive momentum by issuers in reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

Managing risks and opportunities in decarbonisation
As the global economy decarbonises, industries will experience positive disruption and staying competitive in this environment will separate out those issuers that are successful in navigating the energy transition and those that are not.

There is also an opportunity, as investors, to shift capital away from carbon intensive industries and companies, for which renewables are a viable alternative (i.e., thermal coal industry). We believe that decarbonising to meet net-zero alignment by 2050 and the interim goal of 50% emission reductions by 2030 requires a quick and complete phasing out of thermal coal. Consequently, exclude pure thermal coal players. This reduces our risk and exposure to carbon-intensive and carbon-dependent companies and industries; and manages stranded-asset risk and long-term environmental risks.

Our focus then shifts on a two-pronged approach. First, using our capacity as investors to allocate capital and reward companies that are changing their businesses and adopting climate solutions. These solutions can range from electrification to energy efficiency to renewable storage solutions. Second, engage with companies in high emitting industries (such as car, agriculture or oil and gas companies). These companies are themselves looking to invest to change their business to accelerate the energy transition and arrive at Paris aligned business activities.

[1]source: UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2020: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34438/EGR20ESE.pdf

[2]source: UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2020: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34438/EGR20ESE.pdf

[4]https://www.msci.com/www/blog-posts/scope-3-carbon-emissions-seeing/02092372761 

[5]https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources/files/SBT_Value_Chain_Report-1.pdf 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION
This marketing document is for the exclusive use of the individual to whom it has been given and may not be either copied or transferred to third parties. In addition, this document is not intended for any person who is a citizen or resident of any jurisdiction where the publication, distribution or use of the information contained herein would be subject to any restrictions or limitations.

The contents of this document are provided for information purposes only and shall not be construed as an offer or a recommendation to subscribe for, retain, pursue or dispose of fund units, shares, investment products or strategies. Potential investors are recommended to seek professional financial, legal and tax advice prior to making an investment decision. The sources of the information contained in this document are deemed reliable. However, the accuracy or completeness of the information cannot be guaranteed, and some figures may only estimates. All investment involves risks.Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future returns, and investors may lose the amount of their original investment.

This communication may only be circulated to Eligible Counterparties and Professional Investors and should not be circulated to Retail Investors for whom it is not suitable.

This document is issued by the following entities: in the UK: Mirabaud Asset Management Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under firm reference number 122140; in Switzerland: Mirabaud Asset Management (Suisse) SA, 29, boulevard Georges-Favon, 1204 Geneva, as Swiss representative. Swiss paying agent: Mirabaud & Cie SA, 29, boulevard Georges-Favon, 1204 Geneva. In France: Mirabaud Asset Management (France) SAS, 13, avenue Hoche, 75008 Paris. In Spain: Mirabaud Asset Management (España) S.G.I.I.C., S.A.U.., Calle Fortuny, 6 - 2ª Planta, 28010 Madrid.

Andrew Lake

Head of Fixed Income

Continuer vers

Ces articles peuvent également vous intéresser